ProductsAbaqus/Standard In Euler–Bernoulli beam elements it is assumed that the internal virtual work rate is associated with axial strain and torsional shear only. Further, it is assumed that the cross-section does not deform in its plane or warp out of its plane, and that this cross-sectional plane remains normal to the beam axis. These are the classical assumptions of the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, which provides satisfactory results for slender beams. Let be material coordinates such that S locates points on the beam axis and measures distance in the cross-section. In addition, let be unit vectors normal to the beam axis in the current configuration: . Then the position of a point of the beam in the current configuration is where is the point on the beam axis of the cross-section containing . Then and so length on the fiber at is measured in the current configuration as Now since the beam is slender, we will neglect terms of second-order in g and h, the distance measuring material coordinates in the cross-section. Thus, Strain measuresThe internal virtual work rate associated with axial stress is where and are any material stress and strain measures associated with axial deformation at the point of the beam, since strains are assumed to be small. For this purpose we will use Green's strain so that where , the square of the ratio of current configuration length to reference configuration length in the axial direction on the fiber. From Equation 1 and its equivalent in the reference configuration, we have Again, neglecting all but first-order terms in g and h because of the slenderness assumption, this becomes where This simplification allows us to write the internal virtual work rate associated with axial stress as where with and Now the cross-sectional base vectors and are assumed to remain normal to the beam axis, so Hence, So we have and This defines the generalized strains associated with axial stretch. For torsional strain the internal virtual work rate is where and is the proportionality constant between shear strains and torsional strains (see Beam element formulation for details). For computational simplicity the form of the torsional strains is taken to be where and This assumes a linear interpolation of rotation along the beam. Thus, the generalized strain measures for these beams are
With these measures, the internal virtual work rate can be written Internal virtual work rate JacobianFor the Jacobian matrix of the overall Newton method, Equation 3, the variation of this internal work rate with respect to nodal displacement variations must be formed. The constitutive theory is written as and so where is the section stiffness matrix obtained by integration over the cross-section. See Beam element formulation for more information on section integration. First variations of strainsTaking the variations of the above strain definitions gives directly In these expressions we need and as well as ; these are now derived. From the expression for , namely another ancillary vector , normal to the tangent, is defined by so that In addition, so that Since form an orthonormal triad, because . From the definition of , it is straightforward to show that So and Thus, We can also write and Combining terms appropriately, Hence, from Equation 2 In a similar manner one can show that The first variations of strain become so that In addition, so that since form an orthonormal triad, because Second variations of strainsThe second variation of the axial strain is simply To compute the second variations of bending strain, we need expressions for . These are obtained by approximating from which Using these expressions, the second variations of bending strains are written as and For the torsional strain contribution to the initial stress matrix, we approximate This matrix is again unsymmetric. InterpolationIn the virtual work equation the strains include second derivatives of displacement. For this reason continuity of rotation as well as displacement is needed so that the Hermitian polynomial interpolation functions are the minimum interpolation order needed. These are used here. The Hermite cubic is written in terms of the function value and its derivative at the ends of the interval: with node 1 at and node 2 at . These functions are used in Abaqus to interpolate the components of displacement and the initial position vector , so that the elements are basically isoparametric. In addition, rotation of about the beam axis, , is interpolated linearly. This interpolation is unsatisfactory for the user, because the nodal variables are The last four of these variables are difficult to work with; furthermore, making them the same in all elements sharing the same node causes excessive constraint of axial stretch in these elements, especially if the beam axis is not continuous through the node, as in a frame structure or “T” junction. To avoid this difficulty, the following procedure is adopted. At a node the tangent to the beam axis is so Now suppose we store as degrees of freedom at the node, where is the rotation definition introduced above. Since the initial geometry and hence , the initial direction of the beam axis, is known, where is the rotation matrix defined by , and hence is defined by these variables and the initial geometry. Furthermore, is directly available from and . Thus, the above set is a satisfactory set of nodal variables. To eliminate the unwanted axial strain constraint, in Abaqus the stretch at the node of each such element is taken as an internal variable, local to the element (a third internal node is created for this purpose, and so it is not shared with neighboring elements.) It should be remarked that the above transformation (Equation 3) is nonlinear. This leads to some complications—for example, the d'Alembert forces no longer have the simple form rather, a matrix replaces where and use the transformation (Equation 3) and its appropriate time derivatives. The resulting Jacobian is nonsymmetric; Abaqus ignores the nonsymmetric terms. IntegrationThe cross-section integration has already been discussed in the context of the shear beams—it is the same for these beams. Along the beam axis, the integration schemes are as described below.
|